What can you ask of me? I’m waiting on one knee, pretending time stands still and that the instant you speak I will once again begin to live. It seems that my reality falls far from normality, for it is not based on the objectivity of what exists but rather on the simplicity of a kiss. Grow tired will I? Never, for the cadence of this love keeps me at bay converging our lives into singularity, one which exists explicitly. Lend me some of that serenity in which you now dwell in so happily. In exchange I’ll hand you my life, yours too keep for eternity and never shall I fear, for I know that love grows near. Do not stow away from me, whatever may be, always keep close and embrace me. Leave our doubt behind, we have shared it for too long, look me in the eye and know nothing will go wrong. Take me by your side and let us walk through this life, leaving no “what if’s” behind, only this sublimity that eludes society.
Side Note:
Murder is wrong because if you claim that a person cannot be judged upon their subjective view of things and that morality depends soley on that subjective view, then your implcitly declaring that their view of killing can overrule another person’s who thinks killing is wrong. You therefore are stating that killing is both right and wrong, by definition something cannot be two extremes and therefore the logic is flawed. If morality were subjctive then there would be no absolute order in the world, the fact that there is some and that people fall into that order gives evidence of some ojective qualities within morality that may be elusive to human perception. Then there is also the fact that if one claims no one else can judge any one else based upon their subjective views, one has made an objective statement but by claiming the former one should have relinquished any opinion about anything and with it their own moral beliefs. If that were so then based upon that, anything thats ever happend has no absolute meaning to single individual. For example, how a person loves is subjective but the concept is objective; how a person develops their morals is a subjective quality, but the existance of morals (including those that are intuitive) is objective because it is a concept, an idea, that cannot be destroyed.
